How-to-Respond-to-Reviewers.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 - *Be confident*: Try to provide further explanation or rebuttal with the reviewer's unclear understanding, you can promise to make some revisions for the final version, but not too much. Too many revisions will make your submission fall into an unready submission.
 
 ## Response to each reviewer:
-- Thank the reviewer's thoughtful comments/or time, if you have enough response space, e.g. for each review response begin with: `We thank the reviewer for your helpful comments.` Or if you don't have enough response space, at the very beginning for each reviewer, you can use a single sentence, something like this: `We thank the reviewer for your helpful comments. We summarise and respond to your specific questions below.`
+- Thank the reviewer's thoughtful comments/or time, if you have enough response space, e.g. for each review response begin with: 'We thank the reviewer for your helpful comments'. Or if you don't have enough response space, at the very beginning for each reviewer, you can use a single sentence, something like this: 'We thank the reviewer for your helpful comments. We summarise and respond to your specific questions below.'
 - During the response, you can also use references to support your response, if the reference exists in your manuscript, you can just cite with the citation format used in the paper without adding the detailed reference in the response letter. If the reference is new, you cite the same format and need to add the reference in your response letter.
 - If you promise to make the revision in your final version, you need assertively state what exactly you will change, for instance, `We agree that XX, we will do YY in the final version'.
 - Analyse and try to summarise the reviewer's question with a shorter question title, and response to the summarised questions, for instance: `We thank the reviewer for your helpful comments. We summarise and respond to your specific questions below.'